Truth, expressed in numbers 

"It is not in the power of kings to make a man good or evil, but in his own soul."
 

Thomas More, Utopia (1516)

Social Quality Service (SQS) – A Validation System for Political Actors

Introduction

Social Quality Service (SQS) is a civic–political framework for responsible public action, designed to restore continuity, verifiability, and accountability within the public sphere.

The purpose of the system is to establish facts, consistency, and accountability in the conduct of political actors, thereby affirming a high-quality and reliable public discourse.

Objectives of the System

• To establish factual accuracy, consistency, and accountability in the actions of political actors.
  
  

• To enable transparent and verifiable records that link public statements, decisions, and actions to their actual social consequences.
  
  

• To create a public framework in which consistency and credibility become the primary measures of political and social impact, without subjective judgment or condemnation.
  
  

Eligibility for Participation

SQS is an open platform for:

• political actors and holders of public office,
  
  

• political activists and civic initiatives,
  
  

• citizens who wish to contribute to a more orderly and fair public sphere.
  
  

Party affiliation, ideological position, or institutional status do not constitute barriers to participation.

The sole shared requirement is a willingness to subject one’s public conduct to continuous and responsible evaluation.

Role and Mandate of the Validator

Within SQS, a Validator assumes a responsible and voluntary role in monitoring and verifying the actions of political actors and reference points of essential relevance to the development of political awareness and social well-being.

The Validator records the fulfillment of political commitments and the outcomes of political actions, operating in accordance with clearly defined protocols. In doing so, the Validator enables the system to transparently track the consistency and societal impact of political actors.

A Validator assumes this role upon authorization by one or more Inspectors General (I.G.) and operates strictly within established procedural frameworks. Through this function, the Validator fulfills an indispensable role as a witness to political conduct and to reference points of critical importance for political consciousness and the public good.

Anonymity and Public Visibility of Validators

Validators are known within the system (Inspector General, Grand Conservator, cluster level) to ensure continuity, accountability, and the identification of anomalies.

External anonymity is optional and may be exercised at the personal discretion of the Validator as a protective measure against external pressure or repression, thereby enabling independent and impartial engagement.

The validity of the process is ensured through publicly verifiable reference points and outcomes.

Selection of Actors and Validation Reference Points

Proposals for political actors and validation reference points are submitted by Validators within a cluster and are subject to mutual approval.

Reference points whose evaluation timeframe extends beyond the observed quarter are recorded and incorporated into the assessment of the subsequent quarter.

The Inspector General (I.G.) holds discretionary authority to review, add, or exclude an actor or reference point if the level of relevance or priority is deemed insufficient.

The I.G. may also propose the inclusion or exclusion of a Validator in cases of sustained decline in individual credibility. Such decisions are based exclusively on measurable relevance or clearly identified misuse of the system.

Recording of Anomalies and Credibility Assessment

Any anomaly in a Validator’s activity is formally recorded and may result in a reduction of credibility. Validations affected by anomalies are excluded from subsequent assessments of the Validator’s credibility.

Validator credibility is measured cumulatively on a quarterly basis, with detected anomalies producing a visible decline, thereby ensuring transparent documentation of integrity.

Hierarchy and Oversight

Validators operate under the supervision of the Inspector General and the Grand Conservator.

The Grand Conservator serves as the ultimate guardian of the integrity and ethical principles of SQS, with responsibilities that include:

• strategic oversight of the network and its ethical standards,
  
  

• approval of high-impact initiatives and alignment with the system’s mission,
  
  

• establishment and adjustment of weighting coefficients and validation rules to optimize the effects of positive actions,
  
  

• initiation of systemic improvements to preserve integrity and scalability.
  
  

This model provides multi-layered protection of integrity without centralizing operational control.

Operational Methodology

Participants in the network identify and propose events of political and social relevance—statements, decisions, actions, and behaviors that affect the community.

These events are then examined and confirmed through independent verification and mutual oversight, ensuring distance from local interests and immediate political pressures.

In this manner, a lasting connection is established between public statements and their consequences.

What is said or done does not disappear in the next news cycle; it remains linked to time, context, and outcomes.

Long-Term Vision

In the long term, SQS contributes to the strengthening of a political culture that values consistency, credibility, and reliability.

New leaders are recognized through visible and verifiable actions rather than through exploitation of the rapid news cycle, short collective memory, or information manipulation.

The public sphere becomes less susceptible to domination by actors who disregard accuracy and truthfulness, through the clear highlighting of the quality of action rather than through bans or exclusions.

Message

Social Quality Service is an open network.

All political actors and political activists are welcome to participate, provided they accept a simple yet demanding premise: that public speech and public action carry lasting responsibility toward society.